Once the three minute process to "retrieve the client" software was finished, I entered the webinar to find a major distraction. The webinar moderator had enabled public chat and in this case, there seemed to be more chat than webinar. The chat session had taken on a life of its own.
There are of course benefits to public chat within a webinar.
- Attendees can learn from each other during the webinar.
- Webinar hosts, moderators and producers can obtain valuable feedback.
linked inAs you might be able to infer, the polling mechanism was not intuitive so people resorted to typing their choices in chat instead of clicking on the poll. I've bold-faced some of the more telling comments. Folks who wanted to choose more than one poll answer could not but also didn't understand the poll asked for the "most often used" which really only requires one answer. To make matters worse, the poll had no words in it ... just choices A, B, and C so some audience members forgot what A, B and C corresponded to.
twitter,
A and C
none
FB, Blog
none
Facebook and MySpace are worthless
a, b, c
none
All of the above
none
Answer using the feedback box please
Linked In, Twitter, Faceb ook
Twitter, LinkedIn
all the above
All but MySpace
thinking about YouTube
I cannot choose more than one ...
b,c
a,b,c I could only select one answer
and the question?
A,B,C, & D
The feedback box is only allowing one choice (radio buttons vs checkboxes)
This polling is SO cumbersome!
While having the public chat open allowed the audience to vent, it was a major distraction from the pitch that was in progress.
The public chat then degenerated into a gripe session about poor audio on the webinar (one of the speakers was on her cell phone ... a MAJOR no-no in a webinar but supposedly unavoidable on this one). This then segued to a discussion of the pros and cons of various webinar platforms.
Mind you, the webinar was about using social media but the chat session was about anything but! The audio debate culminated with this comment:
Very dispointing that audio is so bad, and it clear that there a lack of planning for the webinar. I would have enjoy this if you didn't have a such a time rush and if we could hear most of the words.As the webinar came to a close one of the attendees wanted to collect the names of all the companies that presented so that he could warn people AWAY from them on Twitter.
The bottom line here is that you take a VERY calculated risk when you enable public chat in your webinar. Even a minor glitch can go from molehill to mountain once it becomes fodder for the chat session. Then, instead of your presentation, the chat session becomes the main event.


2 comments:
Hi Matt,
I'm glad we could connect via Twitter. I was on that webinar with you and it was quite the experience! I agree with you that I was paying more attention to the colorful language displayed in the chat box then the content of the webinar itself. We are just starting to use webinars on our side. Do you have a service that you suggest using? Clearly this webinar didn't do much justice for the iLinc provider, their fault or not.
Jessica,
Thanks for your comment. In fairness to iLinc, the two areas that went awry in the webinar had more to do with the moderators and presenters than the technology. The poll should have had a question at the top of it and the choices (A, B, C) should have been properly labeled. This was a slip up by the moderator.
The audio problem caused by using a cell phone appeared to be unavoidable (according to the presenter). Once she know she could not dial in via a land-line, she should have arranged for a backup presenter who could.
Personally, I've encountered slow load time for the iLinc client which is a strike against it for me. But I know other webinar moderators who are quite pleased with it.
I tend to like IBM Unyte for its simplicity at one end of the spectrum and Adobe Connect for its elegant interface at the other end.
Hope that helps! Thanks again for visiting here!
Post a Comment